These are the top 10 worst processors in 2023, according to the SoC aggregator site, NanoReview. Is your phone has any of these chipsets?
Processors are the backbone of a smartphone so it’s appropriate to demand these SoC (system-on-a-chip) their best.
But sometimes, due to multiple factors, our phone has a sluggish chipset inside, but we hope that these processors in this list won’t pester your everyday life because if it is, wish you luck!
Here are the top 10 worst processors currently in 2023, according to NanoReview:
Chipset | AnTuTu Score | Date released | Our comment | Phone |
Kirin 955 | 139035 | 2016 | This is a flagship chipset that is dated so we shouldn’t expect that much | Honor Note 8 |
Helio P23 | 108668 | 2017 | This is an entry-level chipset that knows what its capable of | Blackview BV9000 |
Exynos 7884B | 113512 | 2019 | This Exynos chipset is perfect for light-usage and nothing more | Samsung Galaxy A20e |
Helio X20 | 126540 | 2015 | This ten-core chipset didn’t exactly deliver on its promised power so… | Meizu MX6 |
Helio P22 | 100782 | 2018 | Despite being a mid-range chipset, the Helio P22 is ridiculously slow | LG W31 |
Snapdragon 450 | 99302 | 2017 | Just don’t bother about using a phone with this chipset for anything other than FB | Samsung Galaxy A02s |
Kirin 659 | 118546 | 2017 | Again, another midranger that’s fallen from grace to a mediocre entry-level one | Huawei P20 Lite |
Kirin 658 | 109621 | 2017 | A slightly weaker Kirin 659 that’s already weak in comparison | Huawei P10 Lite |
Snapdragon 429 | 94035 | 2018 | A modest entry-level phone that behaves well when you use it to intended use | Nokia 3.2 |
Exynos 7880 | 107894 | 2017 | The bottom of the barrel, and for a really good reason | Samsung Galaxy A7 |
So there we go, the ten worst processors according to NanoReview, you should avoid it like the plague because you will suffer from the sluggish performance!